How does Aestus see electrical resistors in a highly conductive matrix?
Aestus’ proprietary method of data collection and processing (GeoTrax Survey™) is up to several orders of magnitude more sensitive than traditional methods (Miller et al., 2014), ensuring the resulting images are more representative of the subsurface. ERI data are collected as raw resistivity data that have to be inverted (i.e., processed) to produce a model of the resistivity structure of the subsurface. The sensitivity refers to how well the inversion can detect spatial variability of resistivity. Greater sensitivity yields higher image accuracy relative to representing subsurface conditions, which leads to a more “drillable” image.
Below is a sensitivity plot comparison of Aestus’ GeoTrax Survey™ versus a standard ERI survey collected at the same location using the same electrode configuration and equipment. Green zones denote high sensitivity (i.e., high certainty); yellows are zones with lower sensitivity but, with proper QA/QC, can still be used to target drilling locations; red are zones with extremely low sensitivity/certainty that indicate very little constraint on the inversion (i.e., should not be used to target drilling locations). Note that most of the standard ERI sensitivity plot is either red (indicating the image would not be targetable) or is blank at depth (i.e. NO data remained after inversion due to high noise and inherent limitations of the standard ERI approach).