Background/Objectives: Remedial substrate injection (light remediation) and thermal (heavy remediation) are commonly used for in situ treatment of contaminated sites. An important component of designing and monitoring these remediation programs is optimizing effectiveness and cost efficiency across varied geologic settings. Traditional monitoring techniques based on wells and tiltmeters often fail to provide sufficient data density to develop a workable conceptual site model.
Temporal electrical resistivity imaging (TERI) technology has been demonstrated to more robustly characterize NAPL and dissolved plume distribution, state of weathering, and the distribution of bioactivity. When these electrical data sets are collected over time (i.e., 4D/temporal/time-lapse imaging), valuable insights about preferential flowpaths, plume migration/behavior, radius of influence, and overall success of remedial actions can be better understood by analyzing changes in electrical properties of the subsurface.
Approach/Activities: Successful monitoring has been performed at multiple injection and thermal remediation sites using both single-event post-injection imaging events or via temporal imaging conducted over multiple time points (e.g. pre- and post-remediation). This presentation will highlight the advantages of the method through a discussion of several project examples which provided information about the benefits and challenges of subsurface electrical imaging and data integration.
Results/Lessons Learned: To date, results indicate conceptual site models (CSMs) developed from electrical imaging with targeted drilling and remediation lead to more successful remediation via injection or thermal. The further use of electrical methods via TERI to better understand the actual injectate distribution and effectiveness of thermal remediation over time has produced a number of helpful lessons. First, electrodes must remain in place throughout the monitoring period to maintain low temporal noise and ensure data quality. Second, channeling and vertical migration of injectate are common occurrences. Finally, electrical signatures can change over time in response to subsurface reactions. Incorporating these lessons into future designs will improve the planning, implementation, and monitoring of both light and heavy in situ remedies for contaminated sites.








